Supply chain and risk

From risk signal to a decision someone stands behind

Risk feeds deliver signals about suppliers, materials and regions. What is missing is the step from signal to decision: what it affects, which measure was chosen, which residual risk was accepted and by whom. rygg models that chain, including the regulatory status of each obligation.

Find your starting point Demo graph: Supply chain and risk

Situation

Signals arrive in large numbers. Which ones affect which parts, programs and customers is worked out by hand.

Due diligence obligations are changing, and teams do not know which version they are working against.

Risk acceptance is decided in meetings and documented in minutes that nobody finds again.

Questions rygg answers

Which parts, programs and customers are affected by this supplier or material?
Which risks have no owner, no indicator or no measure?
Which residual risk was accepted, by whom, on which information?
Which obligations change if a draft is adopted?
Which tier-2 relationships do we know, and how do we know them?

Applications in this use case

Supply chain and risk: 4 applications

context engineering with rygg

Signal triage

From a signal about a supplier, material or region to the affected parts, programs and customers.

Agent context

Agent task: Maps signals to supply relationships and affected objects
Reads: Signals, supply relationships with tier, parts, programs
Suggests: Risk with impact path
Approved by: Purchasing

Metric: Signals assessed within the agreed time

Change of regulatory status

When a draft becomes law or a date moves, exactly the affected obligations and evidence are marked.

Agent context

Agent task: Marks obligations and evidence affected by a status change
Reads: Obligations, legal basis with status, evidence
Suggests: Change list
Approved by: Compliance

Metric: Obligations marked correctly after a change

Accepting residual risk

Residual risk with the measure taken, the information available and the person who accepted it.

Agent context

Agent task: Prepares the decision pack with measures and residual risk
Reads: Risk, causes, effects, measures, indicators
Suggests: Decision pack with sources
Approved by: Management

Metric: Accepted residual risks with a documented decision

Risk gaps

Risks without owner, indicator or measure, visible before the audit.

Agent context

Agent task: Produces the gap list
Reads: Risks, owners, indicators, measures
Suggests: Gap list
Approved by: Risk manager

Metric: High risks with owner, indicator and measure

What rygg provides

Cause, event and effect as links, with measures and residual risk
Obligations with regulatory status: in force, draft, announced, unclear, with check date
Supplier relationships with tier and origin of the knowledge
Gap view: risks without owner, indicator or accepting decision

Who works with it

Chief procurement officer, purchasing
Risk management and compliance
Management and supervisory board

Metrics we agree on

High risks with owner, indicator and measure
Affected parts found per signal, checked against manual review
Accepted residual risks with a documented decision
Obligations marked correctly when their status changes

What rygg is not here

Not a risk feed, GRC suite or legal advice. rygg connects to them and documents the decision.

How it starts

A demo on the supplier graph as a conversation starter, and a pilot when there is a concrete occasion: customer audit, supply shortage, due diligence report.

Find your starting point

Usually starts withPilot 4 to 8 weeks

Four to eight weeks, one slice of your organization, one product line, one field or one agent task as a graph.

Demo graphSupply chain and risk

Signals, causes and effects, measures, residual risk with accepting decision, obligations with regulatory status.